From: "JoAnne L. Hewett" <[log in to unmask]>

Subject: Re: Version 4 of the Exec Summary

Date: August 23, 2013 2:43:49 PM EDT

To: "Jonathan L. Rosner" <[log in to unmask]>

Cc: "CSS2013 Conveners -- [log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>, chip brock <[log in to unmask]>, Daniel Cronin-Hennessy <[log in to unmask]>, Howard Nicholson <[log in to unmask]>, Jonathan Feng <[log in to unmask]>, Lothar Bauerdick <[log in to unmask]>, "Marcel Demarteau" <[log in to unmask]>, Marge Bardeen <[log in to unmask]>, "Michael Dine" <[log in to unmask]>, "Michael E. Peskin" <[log in to unmask]>, Murdock Gilchriese <[log in to unmask]>, Pierre Ramond <[log in to unmask]>, "Ritz, Steven M." <[log in to unmask]>, "Ronald J. Lipton" <[log in to unmask]>, "Shipsey, Ian P." <[log in to unmask]>, "Steven Gottlieb" <[log in to unmask]>, "Weerts, Harry" <[log in to unmask]>, Nick Hadley <[log in to unmask]>

Seems I neglected to actually attach the document.....sorry.  Here it is.

On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, JoAnne L. Hewett wrote:

Hi All,

Here is version 4 - already!  I inserted all of Jon's and Gil's comments and Jonathan's new version of the big questions to the best of my ability. Inexplicably, Jon's and Gil's line numbers did not correspond with my version.  Go figure.  One comment on Gil's corrections, is that I think both Harry and I felt strongly that it actually was a realization at Snowmass that neutrino physics has entered the precision era. So I left that phrase in the text.

Re Jonathan's revision of the questions - they look good to me!  I left in the first "How do we understand" phrase for the Higgs boson, as it seems to be very accurate there.

Keep sending your comments!

-JoAnne