Dear Chip and Michael,Attached is a v4 document with a few corrections. I note two of the comments below (rest are editorial or minor stylistic)1) the EF section section is missing a definition of “Energy Frontier” analogous to the definition of “Intensity Frontier”given in the previous section. It is of course ironic that the Higgs property measurements precisely fit the definition of the Intensity Frontier…Maybe: Experiments at the “Energy Frontier” directly explore physics at the highest energies achieved in the laboratory.2) “How do we understand…” style thing in the big questions section. I have some suggested changes.RegardsMeenakshi
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the SNOWMASS-EF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SNOWMASS-EF&A=1On Aug 23, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Raymond Brock <[log in to unmask]> wrote:hiDuring our conversation:
Here's what we got during our phone conversation. Ignore the Energy Frontier words, since we're working on them. This shows the status of the Capabilities and other stuff.
bestChip
Begin forwarded message:
From: "JoAnne L. Hewett" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Version 4 of the Exec Summary
Date: August 23, 2013 2:43:49 PM EDT
To: "Jonathan L. Rosner" <[log in to unmask]>
Cc: "CSS2013 Conveners -- [log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>, chip brock <[log in to unmask]>, Daniel Cronin-Hennessy <[log in to unmask]>, Howard Nicholson <[log in to unmask]>, Jonathan Feng <[log in to unmask]>, Lothar Bauerdick <[log in to unmask]>, "Marcel Demarteau" <[log in to unmask]>, Marge Bardeen <[log in to unmask]>, "Michael Dine" <[log in to unmask]>, "Michael E. Peskin" <[log in to unmask]>, Murdock Gilchriese <[log in to unmask]>, Pierre Ramond <[log in to unmask]>, "Ritz, Steven M." <[log in to unmask]>, "Ronald J. Lipton" <[log in to unmask]>, "Shipsey, Ian P." <[log in to unmask]>, "Steven Gottlieb" <[log in to unmask]>, "Weerts, Harry" <[log in to unmask]>, Nick Hadley <[log in to unmask]>
Seems I neglected to actually attach the document.....sorry. Here it is.
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, JoAnne L. Hewett wrote:
Hi All,
Here is version 4 - already! I inserted all of Jon's and Gil's comments and Jonathan's new version of the big questions to the best of my ability. Inexplicably, Jon's and Gil's line numbers did not correspond with my version. Go figure. One comment on Gil's corrections, is that I think both Harry and I felt strongly that it actually was a realization at Snowmass that neutrino physics has entered the precision era. So I left that phrase in the text.
Re Jonathan's revision of the questions - they look good to me! I left in the first "How do we understand" phrase for the Higgs boson, as it seems to be very accurate there.
Keep sending your comments!
-JoAnne
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the SNOWMASS-EF list, click the following link:
<Snowmass_Exec_Summ_V4.docx>
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SNOWMASS-EF&A=1---------------------------------------------------------------Raymond Brock * University Distinguished ProfessorEast Lansing, MI 48824Department of Physics and AstronomyMichigan State UniversityBiomedical Physical Sciences567 WIlson Road, Room 3210sent from: [log in to unmask]cell: (517)927-5447MSU office: (517)353-1693/884-5579open fax: (517)355-6661secure fax: (517)351-0688Fermilab office: (630)840-2286CERN Office: 32 2-B03 * 76-71756Twitter: @chipbrock
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the SNOWMASS-EF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SNOWMASS-EF&A=1
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the SNOWMASS-EF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SNOWMASS-EF&A=1
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the SNOWMASS-EF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SNOWMASS-EF&A=1