 |
 |
On Sat, 31 Aug 2013, Matevz Tadel wrote: > Yes, I somewhat expected that ... why can't the client just close them when it > is destroyed then :) Because it's likely that another file will be opened to that same server. Connection time is a high latency operation, so it's best to keep them opened. > This shouldn't be super hard ... you are already flushing the buffers if time > difference from initial frame is greater than some delta_t ... so the machinery > should all be there and just needs to be put in the "close handler". Remember, > this is only when io (or iov) is in effect and each session gets independent > monitoring buffer/stream. Yeah, but I'd like to avoid a lot of flushes with little data. Andy ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1