 |
 |
K-T That is good! If we split per filter which is very easy, we might be ok without doing any other partitioning... Jacek On 09/03/2013 09:39 PM, Kian-Tat Lim wrote: > Jacek, > >> I wonder if we could leverage existing tools to partition >> the 8b-row table (surprise!) that is coming in Summer2013. > > I don't think there's a big need to do a separate partitioning. > The data to be ingested (before CSV generation, at least) is already > partitioned by filter and camcol, in addition to run and field. That > should provide enough in-built partitioning. > ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1