Ok, that is great news! There are some debugging developments that haven't really finished, that might be good to continue. We would like the first set, ccqserv001-ccqserv050. We especially need the first master machine ccqserv001, since all the dev. work has been done on that one. Let me take a look at the "first" set of machines again, I might want to get something off the master there, but probably not. But after that I don't see us needing that set of machines. Thanks - Douglas On 09/23/2013 01:06 AM, Fabrice Jammes wrote: > Hello Daniel, Douglas, Jacek, and Serge, > > Good news ! CC-IN2P3 agree to keep 50 machines running permanently for > Qserv development purpose. > Here's two questions from Rachid Lemrani about these remaining machines > at CC-IN2P3 : > > - Do you havea preference on the set of machines to keep (in ccqserv set > {001 .. 320}), or can the CC-IN2P3 engineers choose it > themselves(depending on racks for example)? > - Do you still need the"first" installed qserv machines (ccqserv {01 .. > 15})?Can it be stopped ? > > Thanks, > > Fabrice > > ######################################################################## > Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list > > To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link: > https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1 ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1