Thank you very much for this, it will continue to be a help
in the dev. of qserv. We will update our lists, and restart
things.
Are these machines up now? Or is there still some downtime
before we should continue testing and dev.?
Douglas
On 09/25/2013 05:43 AM, Rachid Lemrani wrote:
>
> Please find below the list of machines that have been kept running (ccqserv058 missing)
>
> Best regards,
> Rachid
>
>
> ccqserv001
> ccqserv002
> ccqserv003
> ccqserv004
> ccqserv005
> ccqserv006
> ccqserv007
> ccqserv008
> ccqserv009
> ccqserv010
> ccqserv011
> ccqserv012
> ccqserv013
> ccqserv014
> ccqserv015
> ccqserv016
> ccqserv017
> ccqserv018
> ccqserv019
> ccqserv020
> ccqserv021
> ccqserv022
> ccqserv023
> ccqserv024
> ccqserv025
> ccqserv026
> ccqserv027
> ccqserv028
> ccqserv029
> ccqserv030
> ccqserv031
> ccqserv032
> ccqserv033
> ccqserv034
> ccqserv035
> ccqserv036
> ccqserv037
> ccqserv038
> ccqserv039
> ccqserv040
> ccqserv041
> ccqserv042
> ccqserv043
> ccqserv044
> ccqserv045
> ccqserv046
> ccqserv047
> ccqserv048
> ccqserv049
> ccqserv050
> ccqserv051
> ccqserv052
> ccqserv053
> ccqserv054
> ccqserv055
> ccqserv056
> ccqserv057
> ccqserv059
> ccqserv060
> ccqserv061
> ccqserv062
> ccqserv063
> ccqserv064
> ccqserv065
> ccqserv066
> ccqserv067
> ccqserv068
>
>
> On 23 sept. 2013, at 18:08, Douglas Smith <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Ok, that is great news! There are some debugging developments
>> that haven't really finished, that might be good to continue.
>>
>> We would like the first set, ccqserv001-ccqserv050. We especially
>> need the first master machine ccqserv001, since all the dev. work
>> has been done on that one.
>>
>> Let me take a look at the "first" set of machines again, I might want
>> to get something off the master there, but probably not. But after
>> that I don't see us needing that set of machines.
>>
>> Thanks -
>>
>> Douglas
>>
>>
>> On 09/23/2013 01:06 AM, Fabrice Jammes wrote:
>>> Hello Daniel, Douglas, Jacek, and Serge,
>>>
>>> Good news ! CC-IN2P3 agree to keep 50 machines running permanently for
>>> Qserv development purpose.
>>> Here's two questions from Rachid Lemrani about these remaining machines
>>> at CC-IN2P3 :
>>>
>>> - Do you havea preference on the set of machines to keep (in ccqserv set
>>> {001 .. 320}), or can the CC-IN2P3 engineers choose it
>>> themselves(depending on racks for example)?
>>> - Do you still need the"first" installed qserv machines (ccqserv {01 ..
>>> 15})?Can it be stopped ?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Fabrice
>>>
>>> ########################################################################
>>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link:
>>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1
