Dominique,
We will discuss this Thursday and get back to you.
My feeling is that something like 8-10 nodes might
be the sweet spot if keeping 50 long term is not
an option. What is the annual cost to keep all 50
running? (assuming we just take out of service
machines that die).
Jacek
On 09/23/2013 09:45 AM, Dominique Boutigny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Let me add to Rachid's mail that it would be very useful to get a
> detailed description of both an ideal platform and a minimal one, I mean
> the minimum under which the platform is not useful anymore.
> Resources are limited and we will have to make choices.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Dominique
>
>
>
> Le 23/09/2013 03:03, Rachid Lemrani a écrit :
>> Dear all,
>>
>> The term "permanently" is not really correct. It's rather temporary
>> and short-term (to end of this year).
>> We are dealing here with old machines that are/were not maintained.
>> We expect a detailed description of the hardware needs for the qserv
>> test platform for 2014.
>> And our management/experts will evaluate the feasibility of the
>> request for the long-term.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Rachid
>>
>>
>> On 23 sept. 2013, at 10:06, Fabrice Jammes <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Daniel, Douglas, Jacek, and Serge,
>>>
>>> Good news ! CC-IN2P3 agree to keep 50 machines running permanently
>>> for Qserv development purpose.
>>> Here's two questions from Rachid Lemrani about these remaining
>>> machines at CC-IN2P3 :
>>>
>>> - Do you havea preference on the set of machines to keep (in ccqserv
>>> set {001 .. 320}), or can the CC-IN2P3 engineers choose it
>>> themselves(depending on racks for example)?
>>> - Do you still need the"first" installed qserv machines (ccqserv {01
>>> .. 15})?Can it be stopped ?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Fabrice
>
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1
