Hi,
Let me add to Rachid's mail that it would be very useful to get a
detailed description of both an ideal platform and a minimal one, I mean
the minimum under which the platform is not useful anymore.
Resources are limited and we will have to make choices.
Best regards,
Dominique
Le 23/09/2013 03:03, Rachid Lemrani a écrit :
> Dear all,
>
> The term "permanently" is not really correct. It's rather temporary and short-term (to end of this year).
> We are dealing here with old machines that are/were not maintained.
> We expect a detailed description of the hardware needs for the qserv test platform for 2014.
> And our management/experts will evaluate the feasibility of the request for the long-term.
>
> Best regards,
> Rachid
>
>
>
> On 23 sept. 2013, at 10:06, Fabrice Jammes <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Hello Daniel, Douglas, Jacek, and Serge,
>>
>> Good news ! CC-IN2P3 agree to keep 50 machines running permanently for Qserv development purpose.
>> Here's two questions from Rachid Lemrani about these remaining machines at CC-IN2P3 :
>>
>> - Do you havea preference on the set of machines to keep (in ccqserv set {001 .. 320}), or can the CC-IN2P3 engineers choose it themselves(depending on racks for example)?
>> - Do you still need the"first" installed qserv machines (ccqserv {01 .. 15})?Can it be stopped ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Fabrice
--
Dominique Boutigny - CNRS / CC-IN2P3
Now at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Mail : [log in to unmask] - [log in to unmask]
Office : +1 650-926-5759 - Cellular : +1 774-232-0912
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1
