 |
 |
Hello Marco, Instead of implementing this in detail, it would probably make sense to implement this PCB and the components as a single plane of some combined thickness? In that case, you may already know the approximate dimensions and thickness. If there are small adjustments to be made to the thickness later, that would be relatively easy to implement. Best, Maurik On Oct 10, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Marco Battaglieri <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Sho Uemura wrote: >> The detector geometry we use for the first version of simulation production (and the mock data challenge) will be frozen on November 11 - a month from now. This gives us time to test the geometry and start producing data. >> >> So if you think there's dead material that needs to be added, or any other changes, let me know. A 3D model of the current detector, viewable in Adobe Reader, is attached. >> >> I can help if you have detailed questions on what's in the geometry, and I can make changes to the geometry if you get me the dimensions or drawings. >> >> ######################################################################## >> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list >> >> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: >> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1 > Dear Sho, > in front of the ECal there will be a pcb hosting LEDs of the Light Monitoring System. As soon as defined we'll provide the precise geometry, material ... The contribution is small but nevertheless it worth to include it. > Cheers > Marco > > ######################################################################## > Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list > > To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: > https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1 ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1