 |
 |
On 10/01/2013 02:00 PM, Kian-Tat Lim wrote: >> Please let's open a ticket "need to handle FROM ... JOIN ... USING ( >> ...) ". I am not saying we have to support it asap, but we should >> at minimum return an error > Ideally, I'd like *all* syntax not specifically recognized to be > reassembled, passed to the workers, and then have any resulting errors > returned to the user. > Actually, I think it's better for the parser to annotate as "risky" when we are passing unrecognized syntax, and default to rejecting, unless the user query has a "RISKY" (or FORCE) directive at the end of the statement. I'd rather the system not silently return results of questionable accuracy. -Daniel ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1