 |
 |
Fabrice Please see below, we talked about your eups work, and KT suggested to convert to the new style first, he thinks it should be relatively simple. Can you look into that, and then we will have that reviewed? If you get stuck on anything, just emails us here, including Mario Thanks! Jacek On 12/20/2013 01:20 PM, Robyn Allsman wrote: > > '''Database''' (Jacek) > * Jacek provided a very detailed status report from his QSERV meeting > yesterday. See: > https://dev.lsstcorp.org/trac/wiki/Winter2014/Meetings/Database/20131219 > * DB group has been looking into the QSERV needs for a logging > service. A wider meeting on the topic occurred, see: > https://dev.lsstcorp.org/trac/wiki/Winter2014/Meetings/Logging/20131219 > * Jacek expects there will be a prototype of the design in late January > * Fabrice sent email to DM asking for an EUPS expert to review the > QSERV eups use. > * K-T asked if the eups conversion used the HSC-style .build scripts > or Mario's new pkgbuild scripts. Fabrice's conversion predated Mario's > implementation so they are currently .build based. K-T suggested they > convert to the pkgbuild format for more uniformity within DM. > * Fabrice also had questions on the use of python's virtualenv vs > single lsst python path vs direct installation into the python directory > itself. > * K-T said he would respond to Fabrice's email with a near-term > and a longer-term solution. > * See response: Re: [LSST-data] [QSERV-L] Fwd: [HSC Forum] > "Installing virtualenv with eups" ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1