 |
 |
Hello Robert, Thanks for your answer, it is ok for me. i've closed my initial pull request, i will submit a new one when i have implemented all Mario requirements. Have a nice day, Fabrice On 01/09/2014 02:59 PM, Robert Lupton the Good wrote: >>> PS: An alternative to the third bullet is to add a new verb to EUPS, >>> say, 'eups python' (or, better, 'eups show python'), which would return >>> the interpreter that EUPS is using (basically, just 'print >>> sys.executable'). Another alternative is to a new script to bin/ >>> directory, named (say) 'eups_python': > I don't want to add more scripts, so "eups show python" or I'd prefer "eups admin show python" as "eups admin ..." already exists. This parallels git moving away from git_commit etc. scripts, and doesn't pollute the unix command namespace (eups_setup is an exception as it has to be handled specially already, as we source its output). > > I just pushed an implementation: >> $ eups admin show python >> /usr/bin/python > R > > P.S. Fabrice: do I have an outstanding pull request? > ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1