Print

Print


>> PS: An alternative to the third bullet is to add a new verb to EUPS,
>> say, 'eups python' (or, better, 'eups show python'), which would return
>> the interpreter that EUPS is using (basically, just 'print
>> sys.executable'). Another alternative is to a new script to bin/
>> directory, named (say) 'eups_python':

I don't want to add more scripts, so "eups show python" or I'd prefer "eups admin show python" as "eups admin ..." already exists.  This parallels git moving away from git_commit etc. scripts, and doesn't pollute the unix command namespace (eups_setup is an exception as it has to be handled specially already, as we source its output).

I just pushed an implementation:
> $ eups admin show python
> /usr/bin/python

						R

P.S. Fabrice: do I have an outstanding pull request?


########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1