Hi Matevz, I had a deeper look at the issue. Actually the 'host' field is used but not set by the low-level protocol, and there is no caching of protocol objects, hence of Entity objects. I have tried to reproduce it with the simplest setup (one server, two clients connecting with proxies generated with the same certificate from different machines) but I did not manage, the Entity content is consistent with the expectations. Can you say more on the setup where you see this? Cheers, Gerri On 07/03/2014 17:59, Matevz Tadel wrote: > Ping? :) > > Matevz > > On 02/26/14 23:57, Gerardo Ganis wrote: >> >> Hi Matevz, >> >> It smells like a bug. >> I will have a look ASAP, but likely not before tomorrow. >> >> Cheers, Gerri >> >> On 27 Feb 2014, at 00:56, Matevz Tadel <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Gerri, >>> >>> I just noticed that if one comes to the same server from different >>> hosts (with different proxies but with the same DN), the host part >>> of the entity remains what it was on the first connection. I use the >>> entity.host as preferred client host source for monitoring (as it >>> does reverse name lookup). >>> >>> Does this make any sense? I never observed this before so I figured >>> I'd ask before I try to read this out of the code ;) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Matevz > -- +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ Gerardo GANIS CERN, PH Dept, SFT group, CH 1211 Geneve 23 room: 2-R-023, email: [log in to unmask] tel/cell: (+41) 22 7676439 / 76 4871128 +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1