 |
 |
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Robert Lupton the Good < [log in to unmask]> wrote: > > I do take your point about scons checking, but as long as boost evolves > (and it does!) we should probably be paying that price. > > Actually, the sconsUtils package has code (currently enabled by default) that causes it not to check for changes in third-party headers (such as boost), even if "" is used. Not sure if that's in play for the Qserv build, of course. Jim ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1