Print

Print


I agree with Serge. My only hesitation is that we cut one more release 
with it still intact--just for the purposes of referral in case outside 
people want to reproduce the datasets we had for previous tests.

"me too"
-Daniel

On 04/16/2014 03:22 PM, Serge Monkewitz wrote:
> Jacek,
>
>
>      That’s the old partitioner and duplicator. I’d prefer to delete that code (once Fabrice has migrated the integrated tests to using the new stuff) rather than spend time fixing it up.
>
> On Apr 16, 2014, at 3:20 PM, Jacek Becla <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Serge
>>
>> I think we decided to migrate from phi /theta to lon/lat
>> terminology. I can still see phi/theta in:
>>
>>   core/examples/{duplicator|makeChunk|partition}.py
>>
>> Should we fix that?
>>
>> Jacek
>>
>> ########################################################################
>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link:
>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1
> ########################################################################
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1

########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1