Serge
Sounds good, can you open a jira issue (assigned to you :)
so that we have that black-on-white on our to-do list.
Jacek
On 04/16/2014 03:37 PM, Wang, Daniel Liwei wrote:
> I agree with Serge. My only hesitation is that we cut one more release
> with it still intact--just for the purposes of referral in case outside
> people want to reproduce the datasets we had for previous tests.
>
> "me too"
> -Daniel
>
> On 04/16/2014 03:22 PM, Serge Monkewitz wrote:
>> Jacek,
>>
>>
>> That’s the old partitioner and duplicator. I’d prefer to delete that code (once Fabrice has migrated the integrated tests to using the new stuff) rather than spend time fixing it up.
>>
>> On Apr 16, 2014, at 3:20 PM, Jacek Becla <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Serge
>>>
>>> I think we decided to migrate from phi /theta to lon/lat
>>> terminology. I can still see phi/theta in:
>>>
>>> core/examples/{duplicator|makeChunk|partition}.py
>>>
>>> Should we fix that?
>>>
>>> Jacek
>>>
>>> ########################################################################
>>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link:
>>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1
>> ########################################################################
>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link:
>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1
>
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1
