 |
 |
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Serge Monkewitz <[log in to unmask]>wrote: > > On Apr 24, 2014, at 12:21 PM, Jim Bosch <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Robert Lupton the Good < > [log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> >> I do take your point about scons checking, but as long as boost evolves >> (and it does!) we should probably be paying that price. >> >> > Actually, the sconsUtils package has code (currently enabled by default) > that causes it not to check for changes in third-party headers (such as > boost), even if "" is used. Not sure if that's in play for the Qserv > build, of course. > > > Does that mean if I `eups setup` a different version of e.g. boost with > header changes, scone won’t realize that things need to be rebuilt? > > Actually no - as long as the new Boost is in a different place. SCons will see the path change, and that will trigger a rebuild. But if you modify a Boost header in-place, or install a new version into the same place as the old version, it won't see the change. Jim ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1