 |
 |
Robert Lupton the Good wrote on 2014-04-24: > > I do take your point about scons checking, but as long as boost evolves > (and it does!) we should probably be paying that price. I was wrong about scons treating <> and "" differently. What scons does is that it only checks user-specified paths (-I) for includes and skips default system location (/usr/include). Because we use boost header from /usr/include we don't have them in dependencies, this is what confused me. Andy ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1