 |
 |
Very good Andy! This will close the problem on my side @ 100% ;) .. and, as usual, thanks for your patience with my O(1000) logorrheic emails ! tom On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Andrew Hanushevsky <[log in to unmask]>wrote: > Hi Tommaso, > > Indeed, what you have found out is correct. A well intentioned but > misguided update in release 3.0.4 broke the predictability of the recovery > mechanism. I have delivered a patch to the CMS team for 3.2.4 (the current > version that everyone in CMS is using) and they will be rolling it out in a > week or so along with CMS-specific fixes. The patch can be found at > > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~abh/xrootd-3.2.4/XrdClient.cc.patch > > Andy > > > ######################################################################## > Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list > > To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-L list, click the following link: > https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-L&A=1 > -- Tommaso Boccali INFN Pisa ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-L list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-L&A=1