 |
 |
Hi Matevz, I think that I can comment on this historical item. Yes, the reproduceability was explicitely requested a couple of aeons ago. It made sense to me too, easing the debugging. For the other issue with attempt #7 I don't know... Fabrizio On 24/04/14 11:20, Tommaso Boccali wrote: > please note another thing: > > unsigned int seed = XrdOucCRC::CRC32((const unsigned > char*)unfo.File.c_str(), unfo.File.length()); > > so per file always the same random number is spit out, is this wanted? > clearly to have this working one needs the “else” to be operational > above, otherwise there is neither randomness, not retry …. ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-L list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-L&A=1