 |
 |
I really don't care what we name them so as long as the collection name makes more sense than what it is now. On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Graham, Mathew Thomas < [log in to unmask]> wrote: > > I agree changing the name but I don’t like SVTTracks…what other detector > system would they be from? How about something that describes the > algorithm (SeedTracks?) or something that says these are a certain set of > cuts (LooseTracks?) . I suggest these as soon(ish) we’ll have more types > of tracks (GBLTracks) and (maybe) lists with different selections > (TightTracks, BeamTracks). > > On May 22, 2014, at 3:41 PM, Omar Moreno <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Since we are in the process of making minor changes to the recon, I > propose we change the name of the collection of tracks from "MatchedTracks" > to something more suitable for our experiment like "SVTTracks". Any > thoughts on this? > > --Omar Moreno > > ------------------------------ > > Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list > > To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: > https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1 > > > ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1