 |
 |
On 05/23/2014 04:21 PM, Jacek Becla wrote: > Any opinions whether we should bring Bill's logging prototype > into the master, or leave it in his branch (and just tag it there)? > I am inclined to leave it where it is right now, because > ultimately this code will be moved to "log" module anyway, > hopefully very very soon. Let's leave it there. I can help with logger issues, if desired. I'm looking forward to an enhanced logging facility, even though it doesn't have anything to do with this month's qserv release, unless it had been tested against the current tip of master by today. It should probably wait until Jacek (and others, maybe me?) stabilize the build/install/devenv situation. -Daniel ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1