Hi Matevz, Fons, Gerri,
If it comes to TNetXNGFile, I will make the necessary changes this
week and send you a patch.
For PROOF, the old client is still there, so this does not require
an immediate action (although would it would be nice if it migrated). I
would guess it's more about the libXrdMain disappearance and IPv6, but
this does not look like massive change either.
Cheers,
Lukasz
On 23.04.2014 00:48, Gerardo Ganis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Plans for Xrootd 4 in R5 were never really discussed.
> I do not expect big problems for TNextNGFile.
> For Proof is more complicated, because the new client is totally different, so we need a full port of the Proof client, which is in our todo list, but not scheduled yet.
> I will disable building of xproofd until for xrootd 4 until we have a solution.
>
> Cheers, Gerri
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 22 Apr 2014, at 22:53, Fons Rademakers <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Matevz,
>>
>> yes we will support xrootd-4 in ROOT 5.
>>
>> Gerri, Lukasz, what is needed for xrootd 4 support?
>>
>> Cheers, Fons.
>>
>>
>> On 21/04/2014 20:20, Matevz Tadel wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I just tried this ( somewhat unintentionally :) ) and it doesn't work.
>>> TNetXNGFile fix is minimal but Proof seems harder.
>>>
>>> Is there a plan to support xrootd-4 in root-5.34?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Matevz
>>
>> --
>> Org: CERN, European Laboratory for Particle Physics.
>> Mail: 1211 Geneve 23, Switzerland
>> E-Mail: [log in to unmask] Phone: +41 22 7679248
>> WWW: http://fons.rademakers.org Fax: +41 22 7669640
>>
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1
