On 10/01/2014 06:42 PM, Matevz Tadel wrote:
> On 10/01/14 00:40, Lukasz Janyst wrote:
>> On 10/01/2014 12:07 AM, Andrew Hanushevsky wrote:
>>> The issue here is that the redirector is under no obligation to re-pass
>>> opaque information. The only thing it can do is to add additional opaque
>>> information. It's the client's responsibility to maintain the "tried"
>>> history. I don't think the old client does this and drops the history at
>>> some point (so, yes, it's a bug). The new client did much the same but
>>> that is being corrected in 4.1.
>>
>> The new client does not drop any CGI, we observed sometimes the
>> redirector would
>> ignore the tried= cgi though. The old client is deprecated, so if it
>> does not
>> work, stop using it :)
>
> Hmmh, we are using the new client ... also the xrdcp does used the new
> one, right? The logs I sent seem to be coming from the new client ...
The one that you used in the test (xrdcp logs) is the old one.
Lukasz
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1
