 |
 |
The instances seem to be: ...00C0F.root?tried=+1213cmsxrootd1.fnal.gov1213xrootd.unl.edu and ...00C0F.root?hdfs_block_size=134217728&tried=xrootd.t2.ucsd.edu but maybe let's wait what Lukasz finds out from the client logs. The first one does seem rather strange to me though, it comes from the DNS aliases on regional meta-managers in the US :) Matevz On 10/02/14 00:44, Andrew Hanushevsky wrote: > Well, the onlyh time a redirector would ignore a tried is if the tried were > malformed. It's pretty precise on how things get excluded. So, I would like to > see an instance where the tried was ignored. > > Andy > > On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, Lukasz Janyst wrote: > >> On 10/01/2014 12:07 AM, Andrew Hanushevsky wrote: >>> The issue here is that the redirector is under no obligation to re-pass >>> opaque information. The only thing it can do is to add additional opaque >>> information. It's the client's responsibility to maintain the "tried" >>> history. I don't think the old client does this and drops the history at >>> some point (so, yes, it's a bug). The new client did much the same but >>> that is being corrected in 4.1. >> >> The new client does not drop any CGI, we observed sometimes the redirector >> would ignore the tried= cgi though. The old client is deprecated, so if it >> does not work, stop using it :) >> >> Lukasz >> >> ######################################################################## >> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list >> >> To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: >> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1 >> ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1