 |
 |
Jacek, > Nope! It is not the "set" query. I run it by hand, > and I got: > > SET @@session.autocommit = 1; > > +------------------------------------------+ > | no-field-name | > +------------------------------------------+ > | Ignoring meaningless command (in Qserv). | > +------------------------------------------+ > > and after that Qserv was happily running. It's possible that actually returning something is the problem; the SET should usually not return anything. -- Kian-Tat Lim, LSST Data Management, [log in to unmask] ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1