 |
 |
Hi Tapas, Yes, you can use those RPM's or if you look at the download page you will see: Yum repositories We build RPMs for Scientific Linux and make them available through YUM. There are two types of repositories: a stable one - containing only stable releases, and a testing one - serving also release candidates. The repo files for /etc/yum.repos.d are available below: Stable: xrootd-stable-slc5.repo, xrootd-stable-slc6.repo Testing: xrootd-testing-slc5.repo, xrootd-testing-slc6.repo The above slc6 repo can be used with yum to install the head. Andy On Fri, 21 Nov 2014, Tapas Sarangi wrote: > Hi Andy, > > I am a bit confused about which rpm should I test ? Most recent rpm version says 4.0.4-1. Are you suggesting me to try the source code rather than rpm ? > > I looked in here, > http://xrootd.cern.ch/sw/repos/testing/slc/6/x86_64/ > > -Tapas > > On Nov 21, 2014, at 2:41 AM, Andrew Hanushevsky <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Hi Tapas, >> >> Great, you can find the git head repos available via yum from our web page. Specifically, in the page >> >> http://xrootd.org/dload.html >> >> look for >> >> Testing: xrootd-testing-slc5.repo, xrootd-testing-slc6.repo >> >> The above are git head which is pretty close to R4.1. I can give direct links if you would prefer. >> >> Andy >> >> On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, Tapas Sarangi wrote: >> >>> Hi Andy, >>> >>> Yes, I can do some tests for you guys, sometime tomorrow. We are running SL6 version on all our nodes. >>> >>> Thanks >>> -Tapas >>> >>> >>> On Nov 20, 2014, at 8:55 PM, Andrew Hanushevsky <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Tapas, >>>> >>>> No, OSG does not have a version with this patch. If your up to it, you could run git head via a source release or I can supply you with our internal RPM?s (just give me the SLC versions you need). Of course, that would also help us by performing additional testing <wlEmoticon-smile[1].png> >>>> >>>> Andy >>>> >>>> P.S. Only the redirectors that accepts supervisors need this patch. >>>> >>>> From: Tapas Sarangi >>>> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 6:37 PM >>>> To: Andrew Hanushevsky >>>> Cc: [log in to unmask] >>>> Subject: Re: Login: localhost login failed; blacklisted >>>> >>>> Hi Andy, >>>> >>>> Thanks for the reply. We haven?t enabled blacklisting in our xrootd configuration, unless this is something enabled by default. >>>> Since we are relying on OSG packaging, I guess there is no easy fix on our side without waiting for the 4.1. Do you know if OSG provides a version with this patch applied ? >>>> >>>> -Tapas >>>> >>>> On Nov 20, 2014, at 5:42 PM, Andrew Hanushevsky <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Tapas, >>>>> >>>>> Yes, this is a known bug and will be corrected in 4.1. If you have enabled blacklisting (i.e. cms.blacklist directive) you should remove it. The bug was fixed with this patch: >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/commit/a87bef08c8112f9de33ae5a9bb728689ab2602e3 >>>>> >>>>> Andy >>>>> >>>>> P.S. The NODELAY error message is also suppressed in 4.1 ? it causes no harm. >>>>> >>>>> From: Tapas Sarangi >>>>> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 1:41 PM >>>>> To: [log in to unmask] >>>>> Subject: Login: localhost login failed; blacklisted >>>>> >>>>> Dear Xrootd Developers, >>>>> >>>>> Here at T2_US_Wisconsin, we are using xroot-4.0.4 OSG 32 released version. We are seeing problems with cmsd.log for all of our supervisor nodes. >>>>> >>>>> /var/log/xrootd/cmsd.log repeats these messages, >>>>> >>>>> 141120 15:19:47 12849 setOpts: Unable to set socket NODELAY; operation not supported >>>>> 141120 15:19:47 12849 Inet: Accepted connection from 7@localhost >>>>> 141120 15:19:47 12849 Login: localhost login failed; blacklisted >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> and /var/log/xrootd/xrootd.log repeats this one : >>>>> >>>>> 141120 15:35:23 12755 cms_Login: localhost login failed; localhost is blacklisted >>>>> >>>>> As a result we have limited number of servers without the supervisors. All our xrootd servers, redirector and supervisors have dual stack IPv6/v4 network. >>>>> Any help to understand and solve the problem is appreciated. Let us know if you need more information from us. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> -Tapas >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list >>>>> >>>>> To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: >>>>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1 >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: >>>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1 >>>> >>> >>> >>> ######################################################################## >>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list >>> >>> To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: >>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1 >>> > > ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1