Print

Print


Hi @ljanyst -

See PR #169.  This is a no-op on x86 (and, I'm pretty sure, any sane architecture) and now valid C++11.  That makes CMS happy.

For what it's worth, many atomic use cases have little/no impact on x86 as that architecture has strong ordering guarantees.  It's just the ones that involve multiple operations that get expensive (i.e., counter increments).

Brian

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/166#issuecomment-63364218

########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1