 |
 |
Hi Holly, All things SVT have been kicked into high gear, so all the fun we were having coding together and looking at ECal data has ground to a halt. However, I can probably get with Jeremy long enough to agree on a solution that he can code up when he has time. We should really have alignment constants that go into the conditions database for this, like we do for the SVT, since it's possible that these constants could change before/after an access. Just putting in the important constants (six each for top and bottom to describe translation and rotation relative to ideal) shouldn't take too long. I'll try to get with Jeremy quickly before the end of the day and report back what we think we should do. Best, Tim On Jan 13, 2015, at 12:14 PM, Holly Vance wrote: > Hi Tim, Jeremy, > > I was wondering if you had been able to take a look at ecal geometry. It would be nice to input the surveyed ecal geometry from the commissioning run so that we can use this for our calibration studies. We would need to just input a small rotation and translation on the top 1/2 of the ecal. > > -Holly > > On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Nelson, Timothy Knight <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi Holly, > > Back when the code was written (in the time of the dinosaurs) the geometry of the ECal was just a straw-person for the Test Run ECal , which was still far in the future. So, we never thought of the code as serving for a real detector which we assumed might end up looking very different. As a result, the parameters defining the geometry are as minimal as possible and we didn't build in all of the flexibility that one would want for a real detector. So... at the moment I think one can only define a separation between the top and the bottom. However, it wouldn't be hard to change to having a separate value for the vertical position of the top and the bottom halves. Jeremy and I can probably look at this in the next few days when we sit down to work on some analysis of the cosmic data we have been playing with. > > Cheers, > Tim > > > On Jan 8, 2015, at 2:56 PM, Holly Vance <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I am looking to make a few tweaks of the geometry of the ECal so that it reflects what's surveyed. I was not sure where I could move the top half and bottom half of the ECal separately in the compact.xml. Is there a place where I can see the GeomConverter classes? Can someone point me to this? > > > > Thanks, > > Holly > > > > Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list > > > > To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: > > https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1 > > > > ######################################################################## > Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list > > To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: > https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1 > > > -- > BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS > ------------------------------------------------------ > > NOTE: This message was trained as non-spam. If this is wrong, > please correct the training as soon as possible. > > > Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 01NBPDQmH) is spam: > > Spam: https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/canit/b.php?i=01NBPDQmH&m=28eb831cc32d&t=20150109&c=s > > Not spam: https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/canit/b.php?i=01NBPDQmH&m=28eb831cc32d&t=20150109&c=n > > Forget vote: https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/canit/b.php?i=01NBPDQmH&m=28eb831cc32d&t=20150109&c=f > ------------------------------------------------------ > END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS > > ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1