 |
 |
Hi Holly, Back when the code was written (in the time of the dinosaurs) the geometry of the ECal was just a straw-person for the Test Run ECal , which was still far in the future. So, we never thought of the code as serving for a real detector which we assumed might end up looking very different. As a result, the parameters defining the geometry are as minimal as possible and we didn't build in all of the flexibility that one would want for a real detector. So... at the moment I think one can only define a separation between the top and the bottom. However, it wouldn't be hard to change to having a separate value for the vertical position of the top and the bottom halves. Jeremy and I can probably look at this in the next few days when we sit down to work on some analysis of the cosmic data we have been playing with. Cheers, Tim > On Jan 8, 2015, at 2:56 PM, Holly Vance <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am looking to make a few tweaks of the geometry of the ECal so that it reflects what's surveyed. I was not sure where I could move the top half and bottom half of the ECal separately in the compact.xml. Is there a place where I can see the GeomConverter classes? Can someone point me to this? > > Thanks, > Holly > > Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list > > To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: > https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1 > ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1