 |
 |
> On 15 Jan 2015, at 00:57, Fabrice Jammes <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Yes Serge is completely right, Scientific Linux 7 is what we prefer, sorry for the typo. Concerning this particular request, do you need SL7 on the three dev/building nodes ccqserv00[4-6] as well? > > > On 01/14/2015 03:30 PM, Serge Monkewitz wrote: >> On Jan 14, 2015, at 3:16 PM, Fabrice Jammes <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >>> Here's what Qserv team would like to have on the cluster, in addition to what we have defined previously: >>> >>> - Scientific Linux on all node, in order to get C++11 support >>> [snip] >> To be more precise: if possible, we would prefer Scientific Linux 7 over earlier versions. >> >> Cheers, >> Serge >> ######################################################################## >> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list >> >> To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link: >> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1 > > --- Yvan Calas CC-IN2P3 -- Storage Group 21 Avenue Pierre de Coubertin CS70202 F-69627 Villeurbanne Cedex Tel: +33 4 72 69 41 73 ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1