Jacek, > > In addition to Serge's comments, you do know that DeepSources > >are from the coadds and so don't correspond to a single exposure, right? > > Right, I used to. I just remember that table naming in that > release was pretty bad/confusing, so I don't quite believe > what the words say. (Source was an Object, wasn't it?) Source is something detected on an image; in this case it's detected on the coadd image. The plan is to take those DeepSources, merge them with other CoaddSources and perhaps the Sources and DiaSources and even outside catalogs, then generate Objects from that pile. -- Kian-Tat Lim, LSST Data Management, [log in to unmask] ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1