Hi Matt,

As far as the SVT goes: we know from survey that every silicon sensor is within ~75 microns of nominal.  Since that is similar to our measurement errors, it doesn’t make sense to spend time making an “as built” detector model for the SVT. However, we should check that the “as designed” model is actually correct.

Tim

On Mar 26, 2015, at 11:55 AM, Graham, Mathew Thomas <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Hi All, 

We should put together a detector with our best knowledge of the detector as it’s built.  I think we are almost there with HPS-Proposal2014-v9-2pt2. Nathan mentioned that the latest ECAL survey hasn’t been incorporated (or received) yet, so that can wait.  We should probably add in the full 3d B-field…anything else?  Definitely we need to change the naming convention (the HPS-Proposal2014-XXX is from ~2013 when we were _developing_ the proposal)…how about HPS-EngineeringRun2015-v1?

Thanks, Matt

---

Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1

---

Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1