 |
 |
Hi Norman, I don’t know. The ECal in v9 is the same as v8. I didn’t touch anything else than the tracker. /Pelle On Mar 5, 2015, at 3:57 PM, Graf, Norman A. <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: Hello Pelle, I note that the ECal description has a symmetric beam gap for top and bottom. Was the asymmetry that we had in December fixed? Norman From: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Hansson Adrian, Per Ola Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 10:34 AM To: hps-software Subject: New geometry release Hi All, I’ve created a new geometry release v9: HPS-Proposal2014-v9-2pt2 If is a straight copy of v8 except: * It has the new tracker geometry that we need for the counting house (opening angle can be adjusted easily). * I removed the “field definition” planes. * I removed the “recoil” sensors The new tracker geometry has been tested extensively on particle gun type events and also A’ events. As far as I’m concerned it can be the new standard geometry, both for the counting house and for offline. For anyone doing work of the online monitoring or offline DQM please switch to this detector in order to exercise the real thing. The surveyed tracker geometry will be a new release in the coming days. Sho and I need to crunch the numbers. Let me know if there is any questions. /pelle ________________________________ Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1 ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1