 |
 |
I agree with Nathan here. The conditions back end works fine the way it is. Unless you have made changes that are crucial for us going forward, I say hold off on merging your trunk for a while (At least until May 18th). On Apr 24, 2015 6:02 PM, "Nathan Baltzell" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I very strongly suggest to not change any backend of the conditions system > before May 18 > and also not before the first or second pass of reconstruction of all our > May 2015 data. > -Nathan > > > > > > > 3) Conditions system refactoring. > > > > I have a much-improved conditions backend with basically the same > functionality, plus some added features, which is far better organized and > structured now, as well as easier to use from Java code. The potential for > breaking things is obviously there, but I have been testing thoroughly. > This is implemented on the HPSJAVA-488 branch of trunk. I am not planning > on reintegrating this branch in the near future, though I may not wait > until May 16 when we shutdown if I'm convinced that everything is working > correctly. Testing is ongoing with this branch, and I plan to do more of > this early next week. Before doing any merge into trunk, I'll also have > others test this as well. (Any volunteers?) > > ######################################################################## > Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list > > To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: > https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1 > ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1