Hi all,
still stuck with the same problem. I decided to go on with the newest svn
head in order to work with the correct geometry setup, as suggested by
Matt's last email, but again I have some issues with readout+reconstruction,
in both cases (with NoPileUp, or without):
- if I use HPS2014ReadoutToLcio.lcsim (after filtering, which is ok), I get
this error:
java.lang.RuntimeException: no queued events waiting for an EcalHitWriter bank
- if I use HPS2014OfflineNoPileupRecon.lcsim, I keep on getting the error
on RawTrackerHit I was reporting last week:
java.lang.RuntimeException: Could not retrieve IdentifierHelper for
RawTrackerHit. No SimTrackerHits found.
Any idea on how to go on and get eventually some reconstructed tracks?
thanks
Alessandra
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, Sho Uemura wrote:
> It's equivalent. NoPileup is a simplified version of the full simulation.
>
> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, Alessandra Filippi wrote:
>
>> ok, if I go back to my "old" release (3.2) Sho's suggestion works:
>> filtering slic file + HPS2014ReadoutToLcio.lcsim for readout +
>> HPS2014OfflineRecon.lcsim (+gbl for my purposes) for reconstruction.
>> Is this (in principle) equivalent to
>> HPS2014ReadoutNoPileup.lcsim + HPS2014OfflineNoPileupRecon.lcsim, isn'it?
>> thanks, cheers
>> Alessandra
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, Sho Uemura wrote:
>>
>>> I never got to look at this - I was going to and then things got busy.
>>>
>>> Can you not use the full readout simulation (HPS2014ReadoutToLcio.lcsim)
>>> instead? Pretty sure that's not broken. You will need to space out the
>>> events first, following the instructions in this page for "electron beam
>>> data":
>>>
>>> https://confluence.slac.stanford.edu/display/hpsg/Running+Readout+Simulation
>>>
>>> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, Hansson Adrian, Per Ola wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Alessandra,
>>>>
>>>> I didn't have time to test your slic file yet; it?s been pretty busy here
>>>> as you can imagine.
>>>>
>>>> I?m not sure this was ever resolved but I hope Omar or Sho can tell us if
>>>> is or if they could recreate this problem?
>>>>
>>>> I hope I can run your file today.
>>>>
>>>> /pelle
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 22, 2015, at 9:25 AM, Alessandra Filippi <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> I dug the listserv mails to discover that the problem I'm having with
>>>>> the reconstruction of Montecarlo data using the "standard"
>>>>> HPS2014ReadoutNoPileup.lcsim and HPS2014OfflineNoPileupRecon.lcsim
>>>>> (unable to find any track) is not new. I'm replying to the last message
>>>>> of the thread... any news about it?
>>>>> It looks like thresholds have to be disabled, at the readout step
>>>>> (instead of using the TrackerDigiDriver driver in place of
>>>>> TrackerHitDriver, which was my conclusion as well as Bradley's, as far
>>>>> as I can see from his messages).
>>>>> Can you tell me how practically to do this?
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Alessandra
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, Hansson Adrian, Per Ola wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Bradley,
>>>>>> I confirm that the standard chain doesn?t work.
>>>>>> The problem is likely in the conditions. The amplitude for the hits are
>>>>>> way too small
>>>>>> and therefore fails the threshold cut. I disabled the cut and create
>>>>>> the needed hits. We
>>>>>> will update the conditions when we get some time. Btw., for info, this
>>>>>> is in the readout
>>>>>> sim.
>>>>>> However, the recon still fails because the fits to the pulse shape
>>>>>> looks weird and I
>>>>>> suspect it just fails (NaN and infinite values in the shape fit
>>>>>> parameters).
>>>>>> Sho, can you look quickly at this quickly? It looks like the pulse
>>>>>> shapes might be fine
>>>>>> (just looking at a few examples). shouldn?t it work even though the
>>>>>> gain is off or is
>>>>>> there some other threshold cut in the fitter process?
>>>>>> I attach a readout and recon file with thresholds disabled. (A?,
>>>>>> 2.2GeV, v8-2pt2
>>>>>> detector).
>>>>>> /Pelle
>>>>>> ________________________________________________________________________________________
>>>>>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
>>>>>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>>>>
>>>> ########################################################################
>>>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
>>>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> ########################################################################
>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>>
>
> ########################################################################
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
