 |
 |
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015, Alessandra Filippi wrote: > Hi all, > still stuck with the same problem. I decided to go on with the newest svn > head in order to work with the correct geometry setup, as suggested by Matt's > last email, but again I have some issues with readout+reconstruction, > in both cases (with NoPileUp, or without): > > - if I use HPS2014ReadoutToLcio.lcsim (after filtering, which is ok), I get > this error: > java.lang.RuntimeException: no queued events waiting for an EcalHitWriter > bank That's weird. You haven't made any changes to HPS2014ReadoutToLcio.lcsim? > > - if I use HPS2014OfflineNoPileupRecon.lcsim, I keep on getting the error on > RawTrackerHit I was reporting last week: > java.lang.RuntimeException: Could not retrieve IdentifierHelper for > RawTrackerHit. No SimTrackerHits found. This error might be fixable. I'll look at this a bit and let you know. > > Any idea on how to go on and get eventually some reconstructed tracks? > thanks > Alessandra > > > > On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, Sho Uemura wrote: > >> It's equivalent. NoPileup is a simplified version of the full simulation. >> >> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, Alessandra Filippi wrote: >> >>> ok, if I go back to my "old" release (3.2) Sho's suggestion works: >>> filtering slic file + HPS2014ReadoutToLcio.lcsim for readout + >>> HPS2014OfflineRecon.lcsim (+gbl for my purposes) for reconstruction. >>> Is this (in principle) equivalent to >>> HPS2014ReadoutNoPileup.lcsim + HPS2014OfflineNoPileupRecon.lcsim, isn'it? >>> thanks, cheers >>> Alessandra >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, Sho Uemura wrote: >>> >>>> I never got to look at this - I was going to and then things got busy. >>>> >>>> Can you not use the full readout simulation (HPS2014ReadoutToLcio.lcsim) >>>> instead? Pretty sure that's not broken. You will need to space out the >>>> events first, following the instructions in this page for "electron beam >>>> data": >>>> >>>> https://confluence.slac.stanford.edu/display/hpsg/Running+Readout+Simulation >>>> >>>> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, Hansson Adrian, Per Ola wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Alessandra, >>>>> >>>>> I didn't have time to test your slic file yet; it?s been pretty busy >>>>> here as you can imagine. >>>>> >>>>> I?m not sure this was ever resolved but I hope Omar or Sho can tell us >>>>> if is or if they could recreate this problem? >>>>> >>>>> I hope I can run your file today. >>>>> >>>>> /pelle >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Apr 22, 2015, at 9:25 AM, Alessandra Filippi <[log in to unmask]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> I dug the listserv mails to discover that the problem I'm having with >>>>>> the reconstruction of Montecarlo data using the "standard" >>>>>> HPS2014ReadoutNoPileup.lcsim and HPS2014OfflineNoPileupRecon.lcsim >>>>>> (unable to find any track) is not new. I'm replying to the last message >>>>>> of the thread... any news about it? >>>>>> It looks like thresholds have to be disabled, at the readout step >>>>>> (instead of using the TrackerDigiDriver driver in place of >>>>>> TrackerHitDriver, which was my conclusion as well as Bradley's, as far >>>>>> as I can see from his messages). >>>>>> Can you tell me how practically to do this? >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Alessandra >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, Hansson Adrian, Per Ola wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Bradley, >>>>>>> I confirm that the standard chain doesn?t work. >>>>>>> The problem is likely in the conditions. The amplitude for the hits >>>>>>> are way too small >>>>>>> and therefore fails the threshold cut. I disabled the cut and create >>>>>>> the needed hits. We >>>>>>> will update the conditions when we get some time. Btw., for info, this >>>>>>> is in the readout >>>>>>> sim. >>>>>>> However, the recon still fails because the fits to the pulse shape >>>>>>> looks weird and I >>>>>>> suspect it just fails (NaN and infinite values in the shape fit >>>>>>> parameters). >>>>>>> Sho, can you look quickly at this quickly? It looks like the pulse >>>>>>> shapes might be fine >>>>>>> (just looking at a few examples). shouldn?t it work even though the >>>>>>> gain is off or is >>>>>>> there some other threshold cut in the fitter process? >>>>>>> I attach a readout and recon file with thresholds disabled. (A?, >>>>>>> 2.2GeV, v8-2pt2 >>>>>>> detector). >>>>>>> /Pelle >>>>>>> ________________________________________________________________________________________ >>>>>>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: >>>>>>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1 >>>>> >>>>> ######################################################################## >>>>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list >>>>> >>>>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: >>>>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1 >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> ######################################################################## >>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list >>> >>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: >>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1 >>> >> >> ######################################################################## >> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list >> >> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: >> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1 >> > > ######################################################################## > Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list > > To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: > https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1 > ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1