Hi,
>> still stuck with the same problem. I decided to go on with the newest svn
>> head in order to work with the correct geometry setup, as suggested by
>> Matt's last email, but again I have some issues with
>> readout+reconstruction,
>> in both cases (with NoPileUp, or without):
>>
>> - if I use HPS2014ReadoutToLcio.lcsim (after filtering, which is ok), I get
>> this error:
>> java.lang.RuntimeException: no queued events waiting for an EcalHitWriter
>> bank
>
> That's weird. You haven't made any changes to HPS2014ReadoutToLcio.lcsim?
>
no, that's the .lcsim which comes with the svn bundle...
the only thing I have changed (but there is no difference restoring the
"standard" version) is the detectorName in the Conditions driver.
Unless there is something missing in my slic file. I had to include by
hand the SamplingFractions directory in the HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v1 detector,
which was missing... maybe there's someting else regarding the detector
geometry which was skipped, and I didn't realize (which could be the
reason for v0 sensors plotted in wired, and nothing for v1). I'll check
this better.
Thanks, cheers
Alessandra
>>
>> - if I use HPS2014OfflineNoPileupRecon.lcsim, I keep on getting the error
>> on RawTrackerHit I was reporting last week:
>> java.lang.RuntimeException: Could not retrieve IdentifierHelper for
>> RawTrackerHit. No SimTrackerHits found.
>
> This error might be fixable. I'll look at this a bit and let you know.
>
>>
>> Any idea on how to go on and get eventually some reconstructed tracks?
>> thanks
>> Alessandra
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, Sho Uemura wrote:
>>
>>> It's equivalent. NoPileup is a simplified version of the full simulation.
>>>
>>> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, Alessandra Filippi wrote:
>>>
>>>> ok, if I go back to my "old" release (3.2) Sho's suggestion works:
>>>> filtering slic file + HPS2014ReadoutToLcio.lcsim for readout +
>>>> HPS2014OfflineRecon.lcsim (+gbl for my purposes) for reconstruction.
>>>> Is this (in principle) equivalent to
>>>> HPS2014ReadoutNoPileup.lcsim + HPS2014OfflineNoPileupRecon.lcsim, isn'it?
>>>> thanks, cheers
>>>> Alessandra
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, Sho Uemura wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I never got to look at this - I was going to and then things got busy.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you not use the full readout simulation (HPS2014ReadoutToLcio.lcsim)
>>>>> instead? Pretty sure that's not broken. You will need to space out the
>>>>> events first, following the instructions in this page for "electron beam
>>>>> data":
>>>>>
>>>>> https://confluence.slac.stanford.edu/display/hpsg/Running+Readout+Simulation
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, Hansson Adrian, Per Ola wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Alessandra,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I didn't have time to test your slic file yet; it?s been pretty busy
>>>>>> here as you can imagine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I?m not sure this was ever resolved but I hope Omar or Sho can tell us
>>>>>> if is or if they could recreate this problem?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hope I can run your file today.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /pelle
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 22, 2015, at 9:25 AM, Alessandra Filippi <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>> I dug the listserv mails to discover that the problem I'm having with
>>>>>>> the reconstruction of Montecarlo data using the "standard"
>>>>>>> HPS2014ReadoutNoPileup.lcsim and HPS2014OfflineNoPileupRecon.lcsim
>>>>>>> (unable to find any track) is not new. I'm replying to the last
>>>>>>> message of the thread... any news about it?
>>>>>>> It looks like thresholds have to be disabled, at the readout step
>>>>>>> (instead of using the TrackerDigiDriver driver in place of
>>>>>>> TrackerHitDriver, which was my conclusion as well as Bradley's, as far
>>>>>>> as I can see from his messages).
>>>>>>> Can you tell me how practically to do this?
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Alessandra
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, Hansson Adrian, Per Ola wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Bradley,
>>>>>>>> I confirm that the standard chain doesn?t work.
>>>>>>>> The problem is likely in the conditions. The amplitude for the hits
>>>>>>>> are way too small
>>>>>>>> and therefore fails the threshold cut. I disabled the cut and create
>>>>>>>> the needed hits. We
>>>>>>>> will update the conditions when we get some time. Btw., for info,
>>>>>>>> this is in the readout
>>>>>>>> sim.
>>>>>>>> However, the recon still fails because the fits to the pulse shape
>>>>>>>> looks weird and I
>>>>>>>> suspect it just fails (NaN and infinite values in the shape fit
>>>>>>>> parameters).
>>>>>>>> Sho, can you look quickly at this quickly? It looks like the pulse
>>>>>>>> shapes might be fine
>>>>>>>> (just looking at a few examples). shouldn?t it work even though the
>>>>>>>> gain is off or is
>>>>>>>> there some other threshold cut in the fitter process?
>>>>>>>> I attach a readout and recon file with thresholds disabled. (A?,
>>>>>>>> 2.2GeV, v8-2pt2
>>>>>>>> detector).
>>>>>>>> /Pelle
>>>>>>>> ________________________________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
>>>>>>>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ########################################################################
>>>>>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
>>>>>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ########################################################################
>>>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
>>>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>>>>
>>>
>>> ########################################################################
>>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
>>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>>>
>>
>> ########################################################################
>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>>
>
> ########################################################################
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
