Print

Print


I never got to look at this - I was going to and then things got busy.

Can you not use the full readout simulation (HPS2014ReadoutToLcio.lcsim) 
instead? Pretty sure that's not broken. You will need to space out the 
events first, following the instructions in this page for "electron beam 
data":

https://confluence.slac.stanford.edu/display/hpsg/Running+Readout+Simulation

On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, Hansson Adrian, Per Ola wrote:

> Hi Alessandra,
>
> I didn't have time to test your slic file yet; it?s been pretty busy here as you can imagine.
>
> I?m not sure this was ever resolved but I hope Omar or Sho can tell us if is or if they could recreate this problem?
>
> I hope I can run your file today.
>
> /pelle
>
>
> On Apr 22, 2015, at 9:25 AM, Alessandra Filippi <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> I dug the listserv mails to discover that the problem I'm having with the reconstruction of Montecarlo data using the "standard" HPS2014ReadoutNoPileup.lcsim and HPS2014OfflineNoPileupRecon.lcsim (unable to find any track) is not new. I'm replying to the last message of the thread... any news about it?
>> It looks like thresholds have to be disabled, at the readout step (instead of using the TrackerDigiDriver driver in place of TrackerHitDriver, which was my conclusion as well as Bradley's, as far as I can see from his messages).
>> Can you tell me how practically to do this?
>> Thanks,
>>    Alessandra
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, Hansson Adrian, Per Ola wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Bradley,
>>> I confirm that the standard chain doesn?t work.
>>> The problem is likely in the conditions. The amplitude for the hits are way too small
>>> and therefore fails the threshold cut. I disabled the cut and create the needed hits. We
>>> will update the conditions when we get some time. Btw., for info, this is in the readout
>>> sim.
>>> However, the recon still fails because the fits to the pulse shape looks weird and I
>>> suspect it just fails (NaN and infinite values in the shape fit parameters).
>>> Sho, can you look quickly at this quickly? It looks like the pulse shapes might be fine
>>> (just looking at a few examples). shouldn?t it work even though the gain is off or is
>>> there some other threshold cut in the fitter process?
>>> I attach a readout and recon file with thresholds disabled. (A?, 2.2GeV, v8-2pt2
>>> detector).
>>> /Pelle
>>> ________________________________________________________________________________________
>>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
>>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>
> ########################################################################
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>

########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1