Ok, using 150 bunches on 10k events I get ~13% acceptance. Thanks, pelle Trigger Processing Results Single-Cluster Cuts Total Clusters Processed :: 20295 Passed Seed Energy Cut :: 14119 Passed Hit Count Cut :: 11938 Passed Total Energy Cut :: 10991 Cluster Pair Cuts Total Pairs Processed :: 3168 Passed Energy Sum Cut :: 2942 Passed Energy Difference Cut :: 2941 Passed Energy Slope Cut :: 2755 Passed Coplanarity Cut :: 1342 Trigger Count :: 1342 Trigger Module Cut Values: Seed Energy Low :: 0.050 Seed Energy High :: 6.600 Cluster Energy Low :: 0.060 Cluster Energy High :: 0.630 Cluster Hit Count :: 2 Pair Energy Sum Low :: 0.200 Pair Energy Sum High :: 0.860 Pair Energy Difference :: 0.540 Pair Energy Slope :: 0.6 Pair Coplanarity :: 30.0 FADCPrimaryTriggerDriver: Trigger count: 1342 On May 25, 2015, at 3:23 PM, Kyle McCarty <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: Hello Pelle, If you are reconstructing everything from a SLiC file, you need to space out the events because each one contains an A' event and will produce weird pile-up otherwise. I usually insert around 150 empty events between each real event to ensure that the hits and clusters (which are displaced by around 60ish events from the source) do not overlap at all. You can do this with the command: java -cp $HPS_JAVA org.hps.users.meeg.FilterMCBunches $INPUT $OUTPUT -e150 -a You should definitely get better acceptance that that as well; I got somewhere between 15% - 20% acceptance for 40 MeV (I don't have the exact value on hand). Note also that there are (or at least were last I checked) differences in how the Monte Carlo simulation is stored versus the EvIO. In the EvIO data, all the hits and clusters for an event are stored in the same event, but in Monte Carlo readout, they are spaced across several events with each event representing 2 ns of time. As such, some drivers that work for EvIO readout do not for the Monte Carlo (this mainly affects clustering). Sho can correct me if I am misrepresenting something here. - Kyle On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Hansson Adrian, Per Ola <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: Just realized, how is the bunch spacing simulated in the readout step? I suppose I need to add some amount of “time” between the events or do a “NoPileUp” simulation... /Pelle On May 25, 2015, at 3:04 PM, Hansson Adrian, Per Ola <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: Hi, Have some issues getting the MC simulation to run. I’m running readout and recon over some 1.1GeV 40MeV A' MC files locally with the trunk. Slic file is here: /nfs/slac/g/hps3/users/phansson/ap1.1gev40mevall_1_200ux40u_beamspot_gammactau_0cm_30mrad_SLIC-v04-00-00_Geant4-v10-00-02_QGSP_BERT_HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v1.slcio I’m using Nominal-v1 detector and I simulate readout with: java -jar target/hps-distribution-3.3.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.jar ../kepler2/hps-java/steering-files/src/main/resources/org/hps/steering/readout/EngineeringRun2015TrigPairs1.lcsim -Ddetector=HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v1 -Drun=2000 I see 245 accepted events out of 10k events which is much lower than I would naively expect? I then run recon with: java -jar target/hps-distribution-3.3.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.jar ../kepler2/hps-java/steering-files/src/main/resources/org/hps/steering/recon/EngineeringRun2015FullRecon.lcsim -DoutputFile=outfiles/ap1.1gev40mevall_1_200ux40u_beamspot_gammactau_0cm_30mrad_SLIC-v04-00-00_Geant4-v10-00-02_QGSP_BERT_HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v1-recon -i outfiles/ap1.1gev40mevall_1_200ux40u_beamspot_gammactau_0cm_30mrad_SLIC-v04-00-00_Geant4-v10-00-02_QGSP_BERT_HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v1-readout.slcio And I basically get to the 2nd event and then it just hangs there for 5-10mins. Are these the right steps with the latest and greatest sw? Any ideas? /pelle ________________________________ Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1 ________________________________ Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1 ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1