 |
 |
Hello Rafo, Thanks for checking into this. Because of the short length of the leads the hall probe was located in the fringe field, which is why your value is lower than nominal. Since you've looked at this, how stable were the values over time? Norman -----Original Message----- From: Rafayel Paremuzyan [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 12:07 PM To: Graf, Norman A. Cc: hps-software Subject: Re: Magnetic Field Hello Norman, Apparently I was doing wrong, I was using hall probe readings from MYA, which is not correct. I will put correct values, and will re-analyze data. Rafo On 06/05/2015 12:59 PM, Graf, Norman A. wrote: > Hello Rafo, > Thanks for your presentation. It was a nice analysis which raised a number of questions. > One which I hope we can settle very quickly is the value of the > magnetic field. We are currently using a value of -0.24 for the 1GeV > running. This differs from what you showed. Could you please let us know how you chose to arrive at the value you used? > Thanks, and enjoy the weekend, > Norman ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1