 |
 |
Hello Nathan, That's great! I've not yet started to systematically look at the results, but the output files from run 5772 are roughly 4GB in size, which is what I expect. Please proceed. Thanks, Norman ________________________________________ From: Nathan Baltzell <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 5:03 PM To: Graf, Norman A. Cc: hps-software Subject: Re: pass1 Hi All, All calibration runs are now processed and their outputs on disk. The canonical run 5772 is still being processed, and its lcio will end up on disk automatically. It will be good if anyone can do a sanity check on it. I added to the list of canonical runs (i.e. those whose LCIO output will goto /work disk automatically and permanently), since it is easier to do it now rather rather than get from tape later. They looked reasonable on the run spreadsheet: 5698 and 5739 I will submit the remainder tonight/tomorrow unless I hear otherwise. -Nathan On Jun 9, 2015, at 11:48 AM, "Graf, Norman A." <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi Nathan, > Thanks. I saw them on tape, but didn't want to start staging the files > independently. > Norman > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nathan Baltzell [mailto:[log in to unmask]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 8:38 AM > To: Graf, Norman A. > Cc: hps-software > Subject: Re: pass1 > > Hi Norman, > > They're on tape (you can see filesize in the stub files). I'm jgetting the calibration > DSTs and LCIOs to the work disk (submission scripts weren't updated yet). > > -Nathan > > > > > > > > On Jun 9, 2015, at 11:11, Graf, Norman A. <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Good Morning Nathan, >> Thanks! What output lcio files are you looking at? >> I'm not yet seeing any files on disk at >> >> /work/hallb/hps/data/engrun2015/pass1/recon/ >> >> Norman >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [log in to unmask] >> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nathan Baltzell >> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 6:26 AM >> To: hps-software >> Subject: Re: pass1 >> >> Hello All, >> >> Pass1 started with the calibration runs last night. Documentation is going here: >> >> https://confluence.slac.stanford.edu/display/hpsg/2015+EngRun+Reconstr >> uction+Passes >> >> I'm seeing smaller output LCIO files than pass0, by a factor of 2 or more. >> Anyone know if this is expected? >> >> I set one canonical run, 5772, whose LCIO and DST outputs will be going to disk in addition to tape. >> Any more? (Calibration runs' outputs are going to disk too). >> >> -Nathan >> >> >> On Jun 8, 2015, at 21:14, Graham, Mathew Thomas <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >>> We are ready and the release is 3.3.2-1 here: >>> >>> http://srs.slac.stanford.edu/nexus/service/local/artifact/maven/redir >>> e >>> ct?r=lcsim-maven2-releases&g=org.hps&a=hps-distribution&v=3.3.2-1&e=j >>> a >>> r&c=bin >>> >>> >>>> On Jun 8, 2015, at 6:07 PM, Nathan Baltzell <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Everyone, >>>> >>>> There was discussion late last week that concluded we weren't ready for pass1. >>>> That included some idea that there was progress to be made on data >>>> and simulations in order to have some commensurate set. So, are we >>>> now ready? Should we start >>>> pass1 or wait? >>>> >>>> -Nathan >>>> >>>> #################################################################### >>>> # >>>> ### >>>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: >>>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A= >>>> 1 >>> >> >> ###################################################################### >> ## >> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list >> >> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: >> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1 > ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1