Hay Matt,
I just ran the following skimmers over 5772.0 and here are
the results:
Moller : .004
V0 : .018
FEE : .071
So about a 10% overhead on the output size.
Norman
On Sep 27, 2015, at 10:18 PM, Graf, Norman A. <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Hello All,I'd like to propose that we run the V0CandidateFilterthe next time we make a pass over the data. Hereare the statistics running over the pass2 reconstructionof the first partition of Run 5772:
V0CandidateFilter Summary:
events processed = 251823
events passed = 4201
rejection = 0.016682352287122303
Please let me know if you have any questions or needany additional information.Thanks,Norman
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to listTo unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1