Print

Print


not sure how we got into this situation. aren’t we confusing our users since we already have an xrootdfs in xrootd-fuse package?

--
Wei Yang   |   [log in to unmask]  |  650-926-3338(O)




> On Sep 29, 2015, at 3:30 AM, Elvin Alin Sindrilaru <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Andy,
> 
> Maybe we can put a link on the XRootD website pointing the project below.
> Some people might be interested in using it. It's a wrapper around the normal XRootD Python package.
> 
> Elvin
> 
> 
> Hi Elvin, 
> 
> We have now released the first version of the PyFilesystem xrootdfs package:
> 
> http://pythonhosted.org/xrootdfs/
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/xrootdfs/0.1.0 
> https://github.com/inveniosoftware/xrootdfs 
> 
> We’ll be starting integration of the library with Zenodo and Invenio in the coming days as well as verify that we have no performance bottlenecks in the code. Right now the documentation is mentioning rooted v4.1, but we’ll also be updating it to use xrootd v4.2/4.3.
> 
> Cheers,
> Lars
> 
> 
> 
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
> To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1


########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1