 |
 |
> On Oct 21, 2015, at 10:08 AM, Sho Uemura <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > We are not doing anything that contradicts the LCIO conventions. We happen to have chosen a convenient reference point for these track states. You can still write generic, portable code that uses the built-in methods to find the track intersection with the ECal X-plane. But you don't have to. > That’s not the point. > I'm done arguing about this. Me too. The overhaul I’m working on won’t likely affect you anyway. ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1