 |
 |
Thanks. The constants get disabled for MC anyway, so it shouldn't matter. ________________________________________ From: Sho Uemura <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 2:00 AM To: Bradley T Yale Cc: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: Which Detector? v3-fieldmap has survey positions for the SVT. v3-1-fieldmap has, in addition, some Millepede alignment corrections set in the compact.xml. I don't know if the LCDD file was generated in a way that uses these constants, probably it wasn't and somebody who knows what they're doing should run GeomConverter before the LCDD file can be used. But: as long as MC readout and recon use the same alignment constants, it shouldn't matter what they are. So I would recommend using v3-fieldmap. On Sat, 17 Oct 2015, Bradley T Yale wrote: > > What is the difference between the 'v3-fieldmap' and 'v3-1-fieldmap' detectors, and which one should be used for production? > > I started with v3-1, but can make some with both if wanted for comparison. > > ######################################################################## > Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list > > To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: > https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1 > ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1