Can anyone confirm that this is still the correct method to get the track position at the Ecal from Pass 3? 

track->getTrackStates()[1]->getReferencePoint()

This same code worked for Pass 2, but now I mostly get 0 for all values. Has anyone else confirmed this works? The few times I get something other than 0, the distribution sits 6-10cm away from the matched cluster x-y positions. Z position still looks fine. 

-Holly