Hi Andy,
After looking over the code, I get you point related to the Ignore
flag but this also means that this branch of the switch
is dead code: https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/blob/master/src/XrdCl/XrdClXRootDMsgHandler.cc#L560
Since such a response as you said in the comments is handled synchronously here: https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/blob/master/src/XrdCl/XrdClStream.cc#L449
All this is true if a kXR_attn
response can not contain an embedded kXR_waitreps
. Can it? If not, what do you think about removing the dead case branch?
Elvin
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1