On 01/13/2016 10:04 PM, Yvan Calas wrote:
>> On 13 Jan 2016, at 21:53, Fabrice Jammes <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Good news, John has finished its job on the cluster, so we don't need no more to setup ccqserv{100..124}.
>> So could you please try to upgrade kernel on ccqserv{125...149}, and then John could try to launch again its code and see if it still produce kernel panic.
> Just to be sure... Kernel upgrade on ccqserv{100..124} or on ccqserv{125..149}?
>
>
> ########################################################################
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1
Please upgrade kernel on:
ccqserv{125..149}
Cheers
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1
